2022 SSCAN LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES

SSCAN 2022 Legislative Priorities

Scope of Legislative Priorities

SSCAN’s legislative priorities focus on climate change legislation. However, tax reform and anti-war legislation have also been priorities. This is because tax reform is critical to the long term success of climate change policy. We work anti-war legislation because our military is the largest producer of greenhouse gases and because many SSCAN members are in the 9th Congressional District. Congressman Adam Smith from the 9th Congressional District is the chair of the House Armed Services Committee

Principles Used to Determine Legislative Priorities

Proposals that are High Impact
Proposals that are Low Cost
Proposals that, if passed, Send a Statement
Proposals that recognize the importance of Intersectionality and a Just Transition
Proposals that are consistent with the objectives of Other Climate Change Organizations that SSCAN partners with
Someone willing to take the lead

State Legislative Priorities

Support Green Transportation Budget
- that limits new roads
- supports public transit

Pursue Universal K-12 Climate Change Education in K-12 Schools
- e.g. in-service training for teachers
- solarize schools campaign (resilient communities campaign)

Support Aligned Groups

350 Seattle
37th ECC
Seattle Climate Hub
Shift Zero
Got Green
Front and Centered

Local Priorities

Educate through MMP – YOUTH v GOV
Support our Allies
Noemie – Save the Park
Protect Trees
Seattle Green New Deal
Federal Priorities
Pass the Fed Green New Deal
Meet w 9th Congressional District Candidates

2021 SSCAN LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES

Purpose of Document: To List SSCAN’s State Legislative Priorities for 2021, and to Briefly Describe the Manner in Which They Were Arrived at.

Scope of Legislative Priorities

This document deals with statewide legislative priorities
- SSCAN does have local legislative priorities, and these are covered elsewhere on the website
SSCAN’s legislative priorities focus on climate change legislation
However, tax reform is also included as a priority
- This is because tax reform is critical to the long term success of climate change policy

Principles Used to Determine Legislative Priorities

Proposals that are High Impact
Proposals that are Low Cost
Proposals that, if passed, Send a Statement
Proposals that recognize the importance of Intersectionality and a Just Transition
Proposals that are consistent with the objectives of Other Climate Change Organizations that SSCAN partners with

Priorities

Declare a Climate Change Emergency in Washington State
Institute a Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Ban the Sale of New Internal Combustion Vehicles in Washington State by 2030
Pass the Healthy Environment for All (“HEAL”) Act
Institute Mandatory K-12 Climate Change Education in K-12 Schools
Ensure an Effective Rewrite of the Growth Management Act
- More Aggressive Emission Reduction Targets
- Utilization of Innovative Concepts (e.g., 15-Minute Communities)
Pass a Carbon Tax – We Favor the Washington Strong Proposal
Institute a Significant New Progressive Source of Taxation
- To Both Raise Taxes and to Make the Tax Code More Progressive

Note: We remain committed to the Breakthrough Policies that were priorities in 2019 (IMPLEMENT STATEWIDE PRICE ON CARBON IMMEDIATELY; INSTITUTE 100% RENEWABLE POWERED ELECTRIC GRID BY 2040; MAKE COAL ILLEGAL FOR ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION BY 2025; MAKE NEW FOSSIL FUEL INFRASTRUCTURE ILLEGAL IMMEDIATELY; BAN INTERNAL COMBUSION ENGINES BY 2030; REQUIRE ALL PUBLIC FLEETS TO BE ELECTRIC – NEW PURCHASES STARTING IMMEDIATELY; INSTITUTE MANDATORY K-12 CLIMATE CHANGE CURRICULUM STATEWIDE IMMEDIATELY). As indicated by our 2021 priorities, we also remain committed to progressive tax reform; low carbon land use reform; opposition to increased military spending and nuclear weapons.

SSCAN 2020 Legislative Priorities

Zero-Emission Vehicle Mandate
Low Carbon Fuel Intensity
Heal Act (Climate Justice)
Banning Internal Combustion Vehicles (Will Not Pass)
Fossil Fuel Infrastructure Opposition – Tacoma LNG and Methanol Plant
Bill to Ban Blocking of Intersections and Expanded Use of Traffic Cameras
K-12 Education On Climate (Nothing Major in Process of Being Introduced)

We added three new areas: progressive tax reform, low carbon land use reform, and reduction in military spending as well as opposition to nuclear weapons. Here is a summary of their importance in the context of the climate emergency.

Progressive tax reform: To pay for the Green New Deal, local and state Governments need adequate revenue that is based on a fair tax system. We don’t have this now. A recent report found that in our current tax structure “the poorest fifth of residents pay 17.8 percent, (while) the top 1 percent only pay about 3 percent of their income in taxes.” Our state and local tax system, considered the most regressive in the country, has long been unfair and dysfunctional. As the crises of climate change hit us, that will become dramatically worse — our poorest communities will both pay the highest state and local taxes, and face the brunt of damages from heat waves, floods, and poor air quality.

Low Carbon Land Use reform: The land use patterns of most of our communities around the state have been built for cars to be the sole significant transportation mode. These low density communities, a.k.a. suburban sprawl, have much bigger carbon footprints that denser, transit oriented development. Please explore Legislation that both limits the future construction of sprawling development, and retrofits existing communities.

Military Spending and Opposition to Nuclear Weapons. A recent report from NuclearBan.US (www.nuclearban.us/w2w/) shows three ways eliminating nuclear weapons will help solve the climate crisis: 1) Money: The Federal government spends a staggering amount of our tax dollars on the production, maintenance, and modernization of nuclear weapons, estimated in 2019 to be $54.8 billion which could fund the Green New Deal. 2) Scientific and Engineering Talent: In 2016, in the U.S., 5 out of 10 STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) graduates went to work for companies that design, build and

SSCAN 2019 Legislative Priorities

In 2018, recognizing the urgency of the climate crisis, SSCAN supported 8 Breakthrough Climate Policies. None of these policies were pushed forward in the legislature but the urgency of the climate crisis has only increased. As such, we continue to prioritize the Breakthrough Climate Policies identified in 2018. In addition, recognizing that our State Legislature is intent on taking incremental steps, we endorse the Environmental Priorities Coalition 2019 Legislative Priorities.

8 SPECIFIC BREAKTHROUGH CLIMATE POLICIES

IMPLEMENT STATEWIDE PRICE ON CARBON IMMEDIATELY
There are carbon pricing plans in many countries worldwide, and a number of U.S. states (California, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Maryland and Delaware), as well as British Columbia. Carbon pricing plans have been proposed in Olympia during the past few legislative sessions. It is time for Washington State to implement a carbon pricing scheme – either via the State Legislature or via a ballot initiative.

INSTITUTE 100% RENEWABLE POWERED ELECTRIC GRID BY 2040
Washington State should seek to have its entire electric grid powered by clean and renewable energy by 2040. As a state with abundant hydropower, this objective is easier to achieve in Washington than it is elsewhere. Hawaii has already established a plan to move to 100% green energy by 2045.

MAKE COAL ILLEGAL FOR ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION BY 2025
Despite being an extremely carbon intensive fossil fuel, it still plays a role in electricity production. It is used at the TransAlta facility in Centralia, and also used at facilities in Coalstrip, Montana, which then export the electricity to Washington (“coal by wire”). The use of coal for electricity should be made illegal in Washington State. Oregon has already passed such a measure.

MAKE NEW FOSSIL FUEL INFRASTRUCTURE ILLEGAL IMMEDIATELY
Washington has been steadfast in its opposition to new fossil fuel infrastructure projects in the state. However, rather than go through the lengthy process of opposing each project on a one-by-one basis, the state should enact legislation to permanently ban all new fossil fuel infrastructure projects. This has already been done in Portland, Oregon.

BAN INTERNAL COMBUSION ENGINES BY 2030
Electric vehicles are the future of U.S. transportation, but the implementation of this future reality needs to be hastened. Many countries in Europe are pursuing bans on the sale of new internal combustion vehicles, and California is considering such a ban. Washington State should pursue this strategy.

REQUIRE ALL PUBLIC FLEETS TO BE ELECTRIC – NEW PURCHASES STARTING IMMEDIATELY
As the government purchases new vehicles for public fleets (e.g., cars for public agencies, school buses, etc.), it should insist that the new vehicles are electric.

CREATE TAX-INCENTIVIZED GREEN ENERGY BUSINESS CLUSTER IN PUGET SOUND IN 2019
A number of locals – both domestically and internationally – have created specialized business development zones to foster rapid technological and economic development in target industries. Well-known examples include Silicon Valley in the Bay Area and Route 128 in Massachusetts for high-technology. These zones are economically incentivized to encourage a number of firms to locate in the same area, thereby creating clusters. These clusters thrive on the synergistic benefits of the co-location of similar firms. Washington State should create a business cluster for green energy technology.

INSTITUTE MANDATORY K-12 CLIMATE CHANGE CURRICULUM STATEWIDE BY 2020
One of the most appalling dimensions of the climate crisis is the ongoing effort to denigrate the established science on climate change. It is imperative for the public to have the highest-quality, most up-to-date science on climate change. And it is critical for the nation’s youth to learn about the climate crisis. To this end, Washington should institute a formal unit on climate change into its K-12 curriculum throughout the state. This has already been done in Portland, Oregon.

SSCAN 2018 Legislative Priorities

8 SPECIFIC BREAKTHROUGH CLIMATE POLICIES

IMPLEMENT STATEWIDE PRICE ON CARBON IN 2018
There are carbon pricing plans in many countries worldwide, and a number of U.S. states (California, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Maryland and Delaware), as well as British Columbia. Carbon pricing plans have been proposed in Olympia during the past few legislative sessions. It is time for Washington State to implement a carbon pricing scheme – either via the State Legislature or via a ballot initiative. The Alliance for Jobs and Clean Energy will put a carbon pricing initiative on the ballot in 2018.

MAKE NEW FOSSIL FUEL INFRASTRUCTURE ILLEGAL BY 2018
Washington has been steadfast in its opposition to new fossil fuel infrastructure projects in the state. However, rather than go through the lengthy process of opposing each project on a one-by-one basis, the state should enact legislation to permanently ban all new fossil fuel infrastructure projects. This has already been done in Portland, Oregon.

SSCAN 2017 Legislative Priorities

Carbon Tax

We must reduce greenhouse gas emissions to address the harmful effects of climate change and protect our health, communities, and economy. Because of this, a “price on carbon” has long been a priority for SSCAN. A well designed carbon tax will help us to transition to clean, efficient energy which will grow our economy and create a new wave of jobs and prosperity. We ask our legislators to voice strong support for a carbon tax, and to negotiate as high a carbon tax as possible in our divided legislature. We also support policy that will 1) drive investment in clean energy, healthy forests, and water infrastructure and 2) invest in vulnerable communities that have been hit hardest by fossil fuel pollution and climate change. We recognize that we must fund education AND essential state services. Putting a price on carbon can help us do this. We ask that our legislators strongly advocate for, and lead the effort, to try and implement a carbon tax.

Oil Transportation Safety Bill: HB 1611 & SB 5462

With the approval of the Kinder Morgan pipeline, we expect an increase in tanker traffic by 700% through the Salish Sea, meaning more oil moving through pipelines and more export terminals, making Washington State a target for dangerous spills and explosions.

We support the Oil Transportation Safety Bill because it will:
• Ensure that the oil industry pays in the case of a spill or other disaster
• Update funding for prevention, preparedness and response
• Protect Puget Sound from increased oil barges and other vessels from the Kinder Morgan Pipeline
• Protect against refineries turning into transshipment terminals
• Strengthen oversight of pipeline safety
We support this legislation to ensure common sense safety measures that will provide funding for oil spill prevention and response.

Fund the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA): HB 1663 & SB 5501

The Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) has been a successful law dedicated to cleaning up of toxic waste sites, preventing the use of harmful chemicals in products, and controlling pollution to protect water quality. The law relies on one of the most volatile revenue sources in the state budget–the hazardous substance tax. Because oil prices have plummeted and the MTCA fund has been raided repeatedly for other programs, there is a $75 million shortfall in its funding. This priority will impose a tax surcharge on imported toxics to ensure the money is secure and stable to solve the $75 million shortfall. The MTCA is dedicated to the cleanup of toxic sites which often happen in the poorest of our communities. We must care for the most vulnerable and insure that all communities have access to clean water, a stable environment, and good health. Fully funding the MTCA is one important way that we can do so.

Solar Tax Credits: HB 1048 & SB 5499

This bill promotes a sustainable, local renewable energy industry through modifying renewable energy system tax incentives and providing guidance for renewable energy system component recycling. We support this legislation because it will promote solar power by reducing the per-kilowatt-hour incentive rate to reflect the improving market and costs of solar systems, while maintaining an in-state manufacturing incentive.